![]() :eek: )Ī search of the DUC will reveal just about every combination possible over the past 10 years. ![]() If they're gonna continue giving us stuff like this (), putting everyone at risk, I'd rather have someone else do the coding. Stick to the recording guys and let digi do the coding :eek: Again, REAPER is being used as an additional tool to give PT features that it will probably never have and thus a solution to a problem.Ī real pro will use whatever it takes to get the job done. Because of REAPER's ability to adjust it's input recording latency offset to negative values(PT HD cant even do this), he can literally track in repro mode on his MM1200 24trk with 100% accurate time stamping as it gets recorded in REAPER. Let's look at what someone like can do with his REAPER and Digidesign 192 I/O rig along with his 2" Ampex MM1200 24trk. There are a ton of HD Mac users who use Logic, Digital Performer, Ableton, FL Studio, Bidule and Vienna Ensemble Pro in the very same manor and even post their work flows on the DUC. The reality of it all is Pro Tools does not offer this and probably never will. This is extremely productive and keeps me in the creative work flow. I can then easily drag my MIDI tracks from PT to REAPER, do an offline render then drag the audio back into PT and start mixing. I simply make the VI inactive then active again and keep working in PT. If one VI was to ever crash, it wont bring down PT or REAPER. This gives me major stability unlike anything out there. In this way, every single VI runs as a completely separate application in one host and can access as much RAM as they need on their own. Using REAPER to host my VI's, I can have every single plug-in run as a completely separate process outside of Pro Tools. Let's face it, RTAS sucks right now, especially when it comes to tons of VI's and low latency on very large sessions. How do I incorporate it into my PT work flow? For me, it's a host for my VI's that get ReWired straight into PT. ![]() What's wrong with using more than one tool to get the job done? Especially tools that one DAW alone cant offer. Those who use both use REAPER for a small handful of tools in their work flow that Pro Tools cant do on it's own. ![]() ![]() :eek: Most here have stated they use both. Im actually surprised with some of the pro people here talking so much s**t about a piece of software thats not used in any pro studio that I know of and I know a lot.Get serious lads,Protools is ther or there abouts with a few short comings that can be overcome if you know how to use the god damn thing.This is akin to telling people to only use Digidesign/AIR plug-ins and to not bother with 3rd party plug-ins to get the job done. If Reaper is so fantastic why are you still posting here. Reaper,It looks like something calewalk had out 20 years ago and it also had adc.Even garageband looks better,need I say (). Im actually surprised with some of the pro people here talking so much s**t about a piece of software thats not used in any pro studio that I know of and I know a lot.Get serious lads,Protools is ther or there abouts with a few short comings that can be overcome if you know how to use the god damn thing.Stick to the recording guys and let digi do the coding Reaper,It looks like something calewalk had out 20 years ago and it also had adc.Even garageband looks better,need I say more. I'm a "b", until I'm more comfortable and able on Reaper that is. This thread might help AVID understand that LOYALTY GOES BOTH WAYS.īut more importantly, I think people would be interested to know there are other options other than proprietary Apple Logic or even high priced DAWs.įor anyone who doesn't know what Reaper is. I know a lot of DUCers are running Reaper, but I wanted to get a better idea of just how many people have switched or are packing their things slowly. I'm just curious how many PT users have either.Ĭ)installed Reaper as a backup plan in case PT goes south ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |